电报群摘要
链接：https://forums.eosgo.io/discussion/823/eos-telegram-summary-5-3-18-very-excite#latest
Article XVI - v0.3.0 Draft EOS.IO Constitution - Amendment
Thomas发文讨论关于“修订”
Purpose（目的）
Establishes the rule for amending the governing documents and the system.
制定如何修改管理文件和系统的规则。
Text of Article（条款内容）
This Constitution and its subordinate documents the Block Producer Agreement and Arbitrator Agreement shall not be amended except by a vote of the Token Holders with no less than 10% vote participation among eligible tokens and no fewer than 10% more Yes than No vote power, sustained for 30 continuous days within a 120 day period, according to the terms of the then-current system contract.
根据
Discussion（讨论）
The term "vote power" indicates that a person's vote is tallied based on their number of tokens staked for CPU and bandwidth, as handled by the system software.
术语“投票权重”的意思是指个人的投票是基于代币数量的抵押而获得的CPU和带宽，而这些都是被设定在系统软件内的。
The voting called for here can be, but need not be, conducted via a system-level contract. It must be handled on-chain.
这里要求的投票可以是，但不一定是通过系统级合同进行的。但它必须在链上处理。
The phrase "according to the terms of the then-current system contract" captures, at this time, these expectations in the software specification (see GitHub issue #2226):
根据“Then-current系统合同”在这个时候，这些期望都在软件的规格参数里面（参见GitHub issue＃2226）：
>Anyone can propose a new system contract.
任何人都可以提出新的系统合同
>Deposit of 1,000 EOS tokens is required. Get back 90% if & when it passes.
需要抵押1000个EOS代币，假设当他通过的时候，可以拿回90%代币。
>Proposal is a binary of the new system contract plus a Proposed Tx to install it; up to the proposer to validate and/or prove to voters that the binary comes from valid source code; will probably want to publish their toolchain so others can verify it. Verification is a social activity.
建议书是新系统合同的二进制文件，另外加上一个建议的Tx，用于安装它; 直至提议者验证和/或向选民证明该二进制文件来自有效的源代码;可能会想要发布他们的工具链，以便其他人可以验证它。验证是一项社交活动。
>Identity contract can be used to create an identity for the proposal and make attestations about it.
身份合同可用于为提案创建身份并进行证明。
>It's large but the RAM will be covered by the system or referendum contract.
这个规模很大，但系统或公民投票合同将覆盖RAM。
>Voting will be open for up to 90 days.
投票将会持续接近90天
>Voter can vote YES or NO or withdraw their vote entirely (which reduces 'voter turnout').
投票人可以投YES或者NO， 也可以完全撤销自己的投票（这会降低"选民投票率"）
>Voter pays the RAM to store their vote; erase votes after voting ends.
选民可为存储自己的选票而对RAM付费，还可以在竞选结束后抹掉投票痕迹。
>Proposed new system contract is adopted once it meets these criteria:
建议的新系统合同一旦符合这些标准即被采纳：
*Maintains a margin of 10% more YES than NO votes (55%+ in favor).保持Yes比No多出10%的投票（55％+会更好）。
*Maintains a minimum 10% "voter turnout" (10% of circulating tokens have been voted).
至少需要10%的投票率（循环流动的代币中10%已经投票）
*Maintains the above two criteria for 30 days continuously within the 90 day window. (Obviously if they are below 55% YES or 10% turnout at any point with less than 30 days remaining in the 90 day window, the proposal dies on the spot.)
在90天窗口期内连续30天保持以上两项标准。 （很显然，如果他们在90天窗口期内的任何时间点仍然不到30％，那么他们的投票率低于55％，或者投票率低于10％，那么该提案就会被放弃。）
>Having passed, the Proposed Tx to install the new system contract is signed by the BPs; it takes immediately after 15 BPs have signed it.
通过后，建议的Tx将安装新的系统合同，由BP签署; 15 BP之后立即进行签署。
>The Emergency Upgrade process is different and not covered in this issue.
Other comments and implications of the requirements:
Anyone who pays the fee and invokes the Referendum contract can propose an upgrade
紧急升级过程有所不同，本期未涉及。
其他意见和要求：
任何支付费用并援引公民投票合同的人都可以提出升级建议
>We can have any number of proposals open for voting. If multiple pass, they should be implemented in the sequence in which they passed.
我们可以有任意数量的提案可供投票。如果多次通过，他们应该按照投票人选择的结果的顺序执行。
>BPs are expected by the BP Agreement to perform upgrades; failure to do so would be a violation of their agreement and would subject them to Disputes, loss of reputation, loss of votes, etc.
区块生产者将会根据《BP合同》进行升级;如果不这样做会违反协议，并会引起争议，声誉丧失，并导致投票损失等。
>It should be publicly inspectable that the system contract proposed, and the Proposed Tx to install it, is the one signed by the BPs.
应该公开检查被提出的系统合同是被区块生产者签署过的（通过被建议的TX来安装）
>Both YES and NO votes should be possible, on an unlimited number of proposals.
无论是YES还是NO都可以基于无限数量的提案。