This article may contain original research. Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding inline citations. Statements consisting only of original research may be removed. (May 2013) |
The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline. Please help to establish notability by adding reliable, secondary sources about the topic. If notability cannot be established, the article is likely to be merged, redirected, or deleted. Find sources: "Jaro–Winkler distance" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images (May 2013) |
In computer science and statistics, the Jaro–Winkler distance (Winkler, 1990) is a measure of similarity between two strings. It is a variant of the Jaro distance metric (Jaro, 1989, 1995) and mainly[citation needed] used in the area ofrecord linkage (duplicate detection). The higher the Jaro–Winkler distance for two strings is, the more similar the strings are. The Jaro–Winkler distance metric is designed and best suited for short strings such as person names. The score is normalized such that 0 equates to no similarity and 1 is an exact match.
Contents[hide]
|
The Jaro distance of two given strings and is
where:
Two characters from and respectively, are considered matching only if they are the same and not farther than .
Each character of is compared with all its matching characters in . The number of matching (but different sequence order) characters divided by 2 defines the number of transpositions. For example. in comparing CRATE with TRACE, only 'R' 'A' 'E' are the matching characters, i.e. m=3. Although 'C', 'T' appear in both strings, they are farther than 1, i.e., floor(5/2)-1=1. Therefore, t=0 . In DwAyNE versus DuANE the matching letters are already in the same order D-A-N-E, so no transpositions are needed.
Jaro–Winkler distance uses a prefix scale which gives more favourable ratings to strings that match from the beginning for a set prefix length . Given two strings and , their Jaro–Winkler distance is:
where:
Although often referred to as a distance metric, the Jaro–Winkler distance is actually not a metric in the mathematical sense of that term because it does not obey the triangle inequality [1].
Note that Winkler's "reference" C code differs in at least two ways from published accounts of the Jaro–Winkler metric. First is his use of a typo table (adjwt) and also some optional additional tolerance for long strings.
Given the strings MARTHA and MARHTA we find:
We find a Jaro score of:
To find the Jaro–Winkler score using the standard weight , we continue to find:
Thus:
Given the strings DWAYNE and DUANE we find:
We find a Jaro score of:
To find the Jaro–Winkler score using the standard weight , we continue to find:
Thus:
Given the strings DIXON and DICKSONX we find:[further explanation needed]
D | I | X | O | N | |
D | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
K | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
S | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
O | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
N | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
X | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
We find a Jaro score of:
To find the Jaro–Winkler score using the standard weight , we continue to find:
Thus: