行为树的设计与实现

查阅了一些行为树资料，目前最主要是参考了这篇文章，看完后感觉行为树实乃强大，绝对是替代状态机的不二之选。但从理论看起来很简单的行为树，真正着手起来却发现很多细节无从下手。

总结起来，就是：

1、行为树只是单纯的一棵决策树，还是决策+控制树。为了防止不必要的麻烦，我目前设计成单纯的决策树。

2、什么时候执行行为树的问题，也就是行为树的Tick问题，是在条件变化的时候执行一次，还是只要对象激活，就在Update里面一直Tick。前者明显很节省开销，但那样设计的最终结果可能是最后陷入事件发送的泥潭中。那么一直Tick可能是最简单的办法，于是就引下面出新的问题。目前采用了一直Tick的办法。

3、基本上可以明显节点有   Composite Node、 Decorator Node、 Condition Node、 Action Node，但具体细节就很头疼。比如组合节点里的Sequence Node。这个节点是不是在每个Tick周期都从头迭代一次子节点，还是记录正在运行的子节点。每次都迭代子节点，就感觉开销有点大。记录运行节点就会出现条件冗余问题，具体后面再讨论。目前采用保存当前运行节点的办法。

4、条件节点（Condition Node）的位置问题。看到很多设计都是条件节点在最后才进行判断，而实际上，如果把条件放在组合节点处，就可以有效短路判断，不再往下迭代。于是我就采用了这种方法。

设计开始

在Google Code上看到的某个行为树框架，用的是抽象类做节点。考虑到C#不能多继承，抽象类可能会导致某些时候会很棘手，所以还是用接口。虽然目前还未发现接口的好处。

在进行抽象设计的时候，接口的纯粹性虽然看起来更加清晰，不过有时候遇到需要重复使用某些类函数的时候就挺麻烦，让人感觉有点不利于复用。

 public enum RunStatus
 {
     Completed,
     Failure,
     Running,
 }

 public interface IBehaviourTreeNode
 {
     RunStatus status { get; set; }
     string nodeName { get; set; }
     bool Enter(object input);
     bool Leave(object input);
     bool Tick(object input, object output);
     RenderableNode renderNode { get; set; }
     IBehaviourTreeNode parent { get; set; }
     IBehaviourTreeNode Clone();
 }

 /************************************************************************/
 /* 组合结点                                                             */
 /************************************************************************/
 public interface ICompositeNode : IBehaviourTreeNode
 {
     void AddNode(IBehaviourTreeNode node);
     void RemoveNode(IBehaviourTreeNode node);
     bool HasNode(IBehaviourTreeNode node);

     void AddCondition(IConditionNode node);
     void RemoveCondition(IConditionNode node);
     bool HasCondition(IConditionNode node);

     ArrayList nodeList { get; }
     ArrayList conditionList { get; }
 }

 /************************************************************************/
 /* 选择节点                                                             */
 /************************************************************************/
 public interface ISelectorNode : ICompositeNode
 {

 }

 /************************************************************************/
 /*顺序节点                                                              */
 /************************************************************************/
 public interface ISequenceNode : ICompositeNode
 {

 }

 /************************************************************************/
 /* 平行(并列)节点                                                             */
 /************************************************************************/
 public interface IParallelNode : ICompositeNode
 {

 }

 //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

 /************************************************************************/
 /* 装饰结点                                                             */
 /************************************************************************/
 public interface IDecoratorNode : IBehaviourTreeNode
 {

 }

 /************************************************************************/
 /* 条件节点                                                             */
 /************************************************************************/
 public interface IConditionNode
 {
     string nodeName { get; set; }
     bool ExternalCondition();
 }

 /************************************************************************/
 /* 行为节点                                                             */
 /************************************************************************/
 public interface IActionNode : IBehaviourTreeNode
 {

 }

 public interface IBehaviourTree
 {

 }

很多节点的接口都是空的，目前唯一的作用就是用于类型判断，很可能在最后也没有什么实际的作用，搞不好就是所谓的过度设计。如果最终确定没有用再删掉吧。

接口里出现了一个渲染节点，目的是为了能够更方便的把这个节点和负责渲染的节点联系到一起，方便节点的可视化。

如果只有接口，每次实现接口都要重复做很多工作，为了利用面向对象的复用特性，就来实现一些父类

 public class BaseNode
 {
     public BaseNode() { nodeName_ = this.GetType().Name + "\n"; }

     protected RunStatus status_ = RunStatus.Completed;
     protected string nodeName_;
     protected RenderableNode renderNode_;
     protected IBehaviourTreeNode parent_;

     public virtual RunStatus status { get { return status_; } set { status_ = value; } }
     public virtual string nodeName { get { return nodeName_; } set { nodeName_ = value; } }
     public virtual RenderableNode renderNode { get { return renderNode_; } set { renderNode_ = value; } }
     public virtual IBehaviourTreeNode parent { get { return parent_; } set { parent_ = value; } }
     public virtual IBehaviourTreeNode Clone() {
         var clone = new BaseNode();
         clone.status_ = status_;
         clone.nodeName_ = nodeName_;
         clone.renderNode_ = renderNode_;
         clone.parent_ = parent_;
         return clone as IBehaviourTreeNode;
     }
 }

 public class BaseActionNode : IActionNode
 {
     public BaseActionNode() { nodeName_ = this.GetType().Name + "\n"; }
     protected RunStatus status_ = RunStatus.Completed;
     protected string nodeName_;
     protected RenderableNode renderNode_;
     protected IBehaviourTreeNode parent_;
     public virtual RunStatus status { get { return status_; } set { status_ = value; } }
     public virtual string nodeName { get { return nodeName_; } set { nodeName_ = value; } }
     public virtual RenderableNode renderNode { get { return renderNode_; } set { renderNode_ = value; } }
     public virtual IBehaviourTreeNode parent { get { return parent_; } set { parent_ = value; } }
     public virtual IBehaviourTreeNode Clone()
     {
         var clone = new BaseActionNode();
         clone.status_ = status_;
         clone.nodeName_ = nodeName_;
         clone.renderNode_ = renderNode_;
         clone.parent_ = parent_;
         return clone as IBehaviourTreeNode;
     }

     public virtual bool Enter(object input)
     {
         status_ = RunStatus.Running;
         return true;
     }

     public virtual bool Leave(object input)
     {
         status_ = RunStatus.Completed;
         return true;
     }

     public virtual bool Tick(object input, object output)
     {
         return true;
     }
 }
 public class BaseCondictionNode {
     protected string nodeName_;
     public virtual string nodeName { get { return nodeName_; } set { nodeName_ = value; } }
     public BaseCondictionNode() { nodeName_ = this.GetType().Name+"\n"; }
     public delegate bool ExternalFunc();
     protected ExternalFunc externalFunc;
     public static ExternalFunc GetExternalFunc(BaseCondictionNode node) {
         return node.externalFunc;
     }
 }

 public class Precondition : BaseCondictionNode, IConditionNode{
     public Precondition(ExternalFunc func) { externalFunc = func; }
     public Precondition(BaseCondictionNode pre) { externalFunc = BaseCondictionNode.GetExternalFunc(pre); }
     public bool ExternalCondition()
     {
         if (externalFunc != null) return externalFunc();
         else return false;
     }
 }

 public class PreconditionNOT : BaseCondictionNode, IConditionNode
 {
     public PreconditionNOT(ExternalFunc func) { externalFunc = func; }
     public PreconditionNOT(BaseCondictionNode pre) { externalFunc = BaseCondictionNode.GetExternalFunc(pre); }
     public bool ExternalCondition()
     {
         if (externalFunc != null) return !externalFunc();
         else return false;
     }
 }

 public class BaseCompositeNode : BaseNode{
     protected ArrayList nodeList_ = new ArrayList();
     protected ArrayList conditionList_ = new ArrayList();
     protected int runningNodeIndex = 0;
     protected bool CheckNodeAndCondition() {
         if (nodeList_.Count == 0)
         {
             status_ = RunStatus.Failure;
             Debug.Log("SequenceNode has no node!");
             return false;
         }
         return CheckCondition();
     }
     protected bool CheckCondition() {
         foreach (var node in conditionList_)
         {
             var condiction = node as IConditionNode;
             if (!condiction.ExternalCondition())
                 return false;
         }
         return true;
     }
     public virtual void AddNode(IBehaviourTreeNode node) { node.parent = (IBehaviourTreeNode)this; nodeList_.Add(node); }
     public virtual void RemoveNode(IBehaviourTreeNode node) { nodeList_.Remove(node); }
     public virtual bool HasNode(IBehaviourTreeNode node) { return nodeList_.Contains(node); }

     public virtual void AddCondition(IConditionNode node) { conditionList_.Add(node); }
     public virtual void RemoveCondition(IConditionNode node) { conditionList_.Remove(node); }
     public virtual bool HasCondition(IConditionNode node) { return conditionList_.Contains(node); }

     public virtual ArrayList nodeList { get { return nodeList_; } }
     public virtual ArrayList conditionList { get { return conditionList_; } }

     public override IBehaviourTreeNode Clone()
     {
         var clone = base.Clone() as BaseCompositeNode;
         clone.nodeList_.AddRange(nodeList_);
         clone.conditionList_.AddRange(conditionList_);
         clone.runningNodeIndex = runningNodeIndex;
         return clone as IBehaviourTreeNode;
     }
 }

然后实现具体的节点，先是序列节点

 public class SequenceNode : BaseCompositeNode, ISequenceNode
 {
     public SequenceNode(bool canContinue_ = false) { canContinue = canContinue_; }
     public bool canContinue = false;


     public bool Enter(object input)
     {
         var checkOk = CheckNodeAndCondition();
         if (!checkOk) return false;
         var runningNode = nodeList_[runningNodeIndex] as IBehaviourTreeNode;
         checkOk = runningNode.Enter(input);
         if (!checkOk) return false;
         status_ = RunStatus.Running;
         return true;
     }

     public bool Leave(object input)
     {
         if (nodeList_.Count == 0)
         {
             status_ = RunStatus.Failure;
             Debug.Log("SequenceNode has no node!");
             return false;
         }
         var runningNode = nodeList_[runningNodeIndex] as IBehaviourTreeNode;
         runningNode.Leave(input);
         if (canContinue)
         {
             runningNodeIndex++;
             runningNodeIndex %= nodeList_.Count;
         }
         status_ = RunStatus.Completed;
         return true;
     }

     public bool Tick(object input, object output)
     {
         if (status_ == RunStatus.Failure) return false;
         if (status_ == RunStatus.Completed) return true;

         var runningNode = nodeList_[runningNodeIndex] as IBehaviourTreeNode;
         var checkOk = CheckCondition();
         if (!checkOk)
         {
             return false;
         }

         switch (runningNode.status)
         {
             case RunStatus.Running:
                 if (!runningNode.Tick(input, output))
                 {
                     runningNode.Leave(input);
                     return false;
                 }

                 break;
             default:
                 runningNode.Leave(input);
                 runningNodeIndex++;
                 if(runningNodeIndex >= nodeList_.Count)break;
                 var nextNode = nodeList_[runningNodeIndex] as IBehaviourTreeNode;
                 var check = nextNode.Enter(input);
                 if (!check) return false;
                 break;
         }
         return true;
     }

     public override IBehaviourTreeNode Clone()
     {
         var clone = base.Clone() as SequenceNode;
         clone.canContinue = canContinue;
         return clone;
     }
 }

这就是序列节点的设计，但是明显看起来很不爽，里面还出现了一个别扭的变量canContinue 。为什么会出现这个？因为序列节点的特点就是遇到一个子节点FALSE，就会停止并返回FALSE，但是这里我想用序列节点来做根节点，如果是根节点遇到这种情况，那么就不会执行下一个节点，而我看了很多种对于几大节点的描述，似乎都没提到这个。很多都用序列节点做根节点，有些就直接说是根节点。那么要么根节点另外实现，要么改一下序列节点。因为如果序列节点是非根节点的情况下，如果不是每次都从头开始，似乎又会引来新的问题，虽然目前还没想到会出什么问题。不过最后实现执行起来之后发现，用选择节点其实是一样的。所以目前这样的设计，可能是有根本上的问题。希望哪位大神可以指点一下。

然后是选择节点，根据了所有FALSE才返回FALSE的特点设计了

 public class SelectorNode : BaseCompositeNode, ISelectorNode
 {
     public bool Enter(object input)
     {
         var checkOk = CheckNodeAndCondition();
         if (!checkOk) return false;

         do
         {
             var runningNode = nodeList_[runningNodeIndex] as IBehaviourTreeNode;
             checkOk = runningNode.Enter(input);
             if (checkOk) break;
             runningNodeIndex++;
             if (runningNodeIndex >= nodeList_.Count) return false;
         } while (!checkOk);

         status_ = RunStatus.Running;
         return true;
     }

     public bool Leave(object input)
     {
         var runningNode = nodeList_[runningNodeIndex] as IBehaviourTreeNode;
         runningNode.Leave(input);
         runningNodeIndex = 0;
         status_ = RunStatus.Completed;
         return true;
     }

     public bool Tick(object input, object output)
     {
         if (status_ == RunStatus.Failure) return false;
         if (status_ == RunStatus.Completed) return true;
         var checkOk1 = CheckCondition();
         if (!checkOk1) return false;
         var runningNode = nodeList_[runningNodeIndex] as IBehaviourTreeNode;
         switch (runningNode.status)
         {
             case RunStatus.Running:
                 if (!runningNode.Tick(input, output))
                 {
                     runningNode.Leave(input);
                     return false;
                 }

                 break;
             default:
                 runningNode.Leave(input);
                 runningNodeIndex++;
                 if (runningNodeIndex >= nodeList_.Count) return false;

                 bool checkOk = false;
                 do
                 {
                     var nextNode = nodeList_[runningNodeIndex] as IBehaviourTreeNode;
                     checkOk = nextNode.Enter(input);
                     if (checkOk) break;
                     runningNodeIndex++;
                     if (runningNodeIndex >= nodeList_.Count) return false;
                 } while (!checkOk);
                 break;
         }
         return true;
     }
 }

目前对于我的简单DEMO，组合节点只需要这两个就够了，实际上只需要选择节点、条件节点、动作节点就够了。所以说设计是不完全的，虽然能够实现目标需求，但是实际工作量仍挺大，具体接下来会说明。

行为节点

先放一些渲染节点的代码。实际上我基本上是第一次接触自己去渲染一种数据结构，看完网上的大牛们随随便便就能写出个数据结构的示意图，不得不佩服。我一时半会没想出怎么渲染出树状结构，于是就简单的把树按层分组，一层一层渲染，缺点就是不能很好的表现树的样子，父子关系不能很好的表示。这里放出来希望能抛砖引玉。我以后可能会去完事它，但是现在首先是要搞清楚行为树。实现这个完全是为了看看节点是否正确放置，以方便调试。

 public class RenderableNode
 {
     public RenderableNode parent;
     public IBehaviourTreeNode targetNode;
     public Rect posRect = new Rect();
     public string name;
     public int layer;
     public RunStatus staus;
     public override string ToString()
     {
         return name + "\n" + staus.ToString();
     }
     public virtual void Render()
     {
         bool running = staus == RunStatus.Running;
         var rect = posRect;
         rect.y -= (posRect.height / 2);

         var oldColor = GUI.color;
          if (running)
         {
             GUI.color = Color.green;
         }
         GUI.Box(rect, ToString());
         GUI.color = oldColor;

         if (parent == null && targetNode != null && targetNode.parent!=null)
         {
             parent = targetNode.parent.renderNode;
         }
         if (parent != null)
         {
             Vector2 parentPos = new Vector2();
             parentPos.x = parent.posRect.x + parent.posRect.width;
             parentPos.y = parent.posRect.y;
             GUIHelper.DrawLine(new Vector2(rect.x, rect.y + rect.height / 2), parentPos, running?Color.green:Color.yellow);
         }

     }
 }

 public class RenderableCondictionNode : RenderableNode
 {
     public IConditionNode targetCondictionNode;
     public override string ToString() { parent = null; return name; }
     public override void Render()
     {
         var rect = posRect;
         rect.y -= (posRect.height / 2);

         var oldColor = GUI.color;
         if (targetCondictionNode.ExternalCondition())
             GUI.color = Color.green;
         else
             GUI.color = Color.blue;
         GUI.Box(rect, ToString());
         GUI.color = oldColor;
     }
 }

 public class EmptyNode : RenderableNode { public override void Render() { } }

 public class NodeBox
 {
     public Rect posRect = new Rect();
     public List<RenderableNode> nodeList = new List<RenderableNode>();
     public void AddNode(RenderableNode node)
     {
         nodeList.Add(node);
     }
     public void Render()
     {
         posRect.y = Screen.height / 2;
         Rect rect = new Rect();

         foreach (var node in nodeList)
         {
             var n = node;
             rect.height += (n.posRect.height + 1);
             rect.width = n.posRect.width + 10;
         }
         rect.height += 10;
         rect.x = posRect.x - rect.width / 2;
         rect.y = posRect.y - rect.height / 2;
         //GUI.Box(rect, "");
         posRect.width = rect.width;
         posRect.height = rect.height;
         float height = 0;
         for (var i = 0; i < nodeList.Count; i++)
         {
             var n = nodeList[i];
             n.posRect.y = rect.y + height + n.posRect.height / 2 + 5;
             n.posRect.x = rect.x + 5;
             n.Render();
             height += n.posRect.height + 1;
         }
     }
 }

放一张渲染出来的效果

虽然每一组都只是简单的居中，不过效果看起来还可以接受

然后从图中就可以看到问题了。所有正条件，都会有一个反条件，不这么做就无法在条件改变时，让当前节点返回FALSE，从而让行为树去寻找其他节点。而如果用状态机来做的话，条件肯定只用判断一次，比如

 if(run){
    Run();
 }
 else{
    Walk();
 }

那么可能就回到最初的组合节点的设计了，组合节点就不得不每次都扫描条件。其实本质上我是在担心开销问题，因为变成节点后，就不在是if else那么简单，而是变成了函数调用的开销。简单的AI还好，如果大量复杂的AI，每次对整棵树进行扫描估计够呛。但是目前的设计，条件节点就会非常多，条件不完备就会出现BUG，似乎也不是非常好的情况。

最后放出一些细节

 class PatrolAction : BaseActionNode {

         public PatrolAction() { nodeName_ += "巡逻行为"; }

         public override bool Tick(object input_, object output_)
         {
            // var input = input_ as WarriorInputData;
             var output = output_ as WarriorOutPutData;
             output.action = WarriorActon.ePatrol;
             return true;
         }
     }

     class RunAwayAction : BaseActionNode {
         public RunAwayAction() { nodeName_ += "逃跑行为"; }

         public override bool Tick(object input_, object output_)
         {
             // var input = input_ as WarriorInputData;
             var output = output_ as WarriorOutPutData;
             output.action = WarriorActon.eRunAway;
             return true;
         }
     }

     class AttackAction : BaseActionNode {
         public AttackAction() { nodeName_ += "攻击行为"; }

         public override bool Tick(object input_, object output_)
         {
             // var input = input_ as WarriorInputData;
             var output = output_ as WarriorOutPutData;
             output.action = WarriorActon.eAttack;
             return true;
         }
     }

     class CrazyAttackAction : BaseActionNode {
         public CrazyAttackAction() { nodeName_ += "疯狂攻击行为"; }

         public override bool Tick(object input_, object output_)
         {
             // var input = input_ as WarriorInputData;
             var output = output_ as WarriorOutPutData;
             output.action = WarriorActon.eCrazyAttack;
             return true;
         }
     }

     class AlertAction : BaseActionNode
     {
         public AlertAction() { nodeName_ += "警戒行为"; }
         public override bool Tick(object input_, object output_)
         {
             // var input = input_ as WarriorInputData;
             var output = output_ as WarriorOutPutData;
             output.action = WarriorActon.eAlert;
             return true;
         }
     }

 private ICompositeNode rootNode = new SelectorNode();
     private WarriorInputData inputData = new WarriorInputData();
     private WarriorOutPutData outputData = new WarriorOutPutData();
     // Use this for initialization
     public void Start()
     {
         inputData.attribute = GetComponent<CharacterAttribute>();

         rootNode.nodeName += "根";

         //条件
         var hasNoTarget = new PreconditionNOT(() => { return inputData.attribute.hasTarget; });
         hasNoTarget.nodeName = "无目标";
         var hasTarget = new Precondition(hasNoTarget);
         hasTarget.nodeName = "发现目标";
         var isAnger = new Precondition(() => { return inputData.attribute.isAnger; });
         isAnger.nodeName = "愤怒状态";
         var isNotAnger = new PreconditionNOT(isAnger);
         isNotAnger.nodeName = "非愤怒状态";
         var HPLessThan500 = new Precondition(() => { return inputData.attribute.health < 500; });
         HPLessThan500.nodeName = "血少于500";
         var HPMoreThan500 = new PreconditionNOT(HPLessThan500);
         HPMoreThan500.nodeName = "血大于500";
         var isAlert = new Precondition(() => { return inputData.attribute.isAlert; });
         isAlert.nodeName = "警戒";
         var isNotAlert = new PreconditionNOT(isAlert);
         isNotAlert.nodeName = "非警戒";


         var patrolNode = new SequenceNode();
         patrolNode.nodeName += "巡逻";
         patrolNode.AddCondition(hasNoTarget);
         patrolNode.AddCondition(isNotAlert);
         patrolNode.AddNode(new PatrolAction());

         var alert = new SequenceNode();
         alert.nodeName += "警戒";
         alert.AddCondition(hasNoTarget);
         alert.AddCondition(isAlert);
         alert.AddNode(new AlertAction());

         var runaway = new SequenceNode();
         runaway.nodeName += "逃跑";
         runaway.AddCondition(hasTarget);
         runaway.AddCondition(HPLessThan500);
         runaway.AddNode(new RunAwayAction());

         var attack = new SelectorNode();
         attack.nodeName += "攻击";
         attack.AddCondition(hasTarget);
         attack.AddCondition(HPMoreThan500);

         var attackCrazy = new SequenceNode();
         attackCrazy.nodeName += "疯狂攻击";
         attackCrazy.AddCondition(isAnger);
         attackCrazy.AddNode(new CrazyAttackAction());
         attack.AddNode(attackCrazy);

         var attackNormal = new SequenceNode();
         attackNormal.nodeName += "普通攻击";
         attackNormal.AddCondition(isNotAnger);
         attackNormal.AddNode(new AttackAction());
         attack.AddNode(attackNormal);

         rootNode.AddNode(patrolNode);
         rootNode.AddNode(alert);
         rootNode.AddNode(runaway);
         rootNode.AddNode(attack);
         var ret = rootNode.Enter(inputData);
         if (!ret)
         {
             Debug.Log("无可执行节点！");
         }
     }

     // Update is called once per frame
     void Update () {
         var ret = rootNode.Tick(inputData, outputData);

         if (!ret)
             rootNode.Leave(inputData);

         if (rootNode.status == RunStatus.Completed)
         {
             ret = rootNode.Enter(inputData);
             if (!ret)
                 rootNode.Leave(inputData);
         }
         else if (rootNode.status == RunStatus.Failure)
         {
             Debug.Log("BT Failed");
             enabled = false;
         }

         if (outputData.action != inputData.action)
         {
             OnActionChange(outputData.action, inputData.action);
             inputData.action = outputData.action;
         }
     }

     void OnActionChange(WarriorActon action, WarriorActon lastAction) {
       //  print("OnActionChange "+action+" last:"+lastAction);
         switch (lastAction)
         {
             case WarriorActon.ePatrol:
                 GetComponent<WarriorPatrol>().enabled = false;
                 break;
             case WarriorActon.eAttack:
             case WarriorActon.eCrazyAttack:
                 GetComponent<WarriorAttack>().enabled = false;
                 break;
             case WarriorActon.eRunAway:
                 GetComponent<WarriorRunAway>().enabled = false;
                 break;
             case WarriorActon.eAlert:
                 GetComponent<WarriorAlert>().enabled = false;
                 break;
         }

         switch (action) {
             case WarriorActon.ePatrol:
                 GetComponent<WarriorPatrol>().enabled = true;
                 break;
             case WarriorActon.eAttack:
                 var attack = GetComponent<WarriorAttack>();
                 attack.revenge = false;
                 attack.enabled = true;
                 break;
             case WarriorActon.eCrazyAttack:
                 var crazyAttack = GetComponent<WarriorAttack>();
                 crazyAttack.revenge = true;
                 crazyAttack.enabled = true;
                 break;
             case WarriorActon.eRunAway:
                 GetComponent<WarriorRunAway>().enabled = true;
                 break;
             case WarriorActon.eAlert:
                 GetComponent<WarriorAlert>().enabled = true;
                 break;
             case WarriorActon.eIdle:
                 GetComponent<WarriorPatrol>().enabled = false;
                 GetComponent<WarriorAttack>().enabled = false;
                 GetComponent<WarriorRunAway>().enabled = false;
                 break;
         }
     }