Given two words word1 and word2, find the minimum number of steps required to convert word1 to word2. (each operation is counted as 1 step.)
You have the following 3 operations permitted on a word:
a) Insert a character
b) Delete a character
c) Replace a character
class Solution {
public:
int minDistance(string word1, string word2) {
int len1 = word1.size(), len2 = word2.size();
vector<vector<int>> arr(len1 + 1, vector<int>(len2 + 1, 0));
for (int i = 0; i != len1 + 1; i++){
for (int j = 0; j != len2 + 1; j++){
if (i == 0){
arr[i][j] = j;
}
else if (j == 0){
arr[i][j] = i;
}
else{
if (word1[i - 1] == word2[j - 1])
arr[i][j] = min(min(arr[i][j - 1], arr[i - 1][j]) + 1, arr[i - 1][j - 1]);
else
arr[i][j] = min(min(arr[i - 1][j - 1], arr[i - 1][j]), arr[i][j - 1]) + 1;
}
}
}
return arr[len1][len2];
}
};
可以使用滚动数组来优化 空间复杂度
/* This is a classic problem of Dynamic Programming. We define the state dp[i][j] to be the minimum number of operations to convert word1[0..i - 1] to word2[0..j - 1]. The state equations have two cases: the boundary case and the general case. Note that in the above notations, both i and j take values starting from 1. For the boundary case, that is, to convert a string to an empty string, it is easy to see that the mininum number of operations to convert word1[0..i - 1] to "" requires at least i operations (deletions). In fact, the boundary case is simply: dp[i][0] = i; dp[0][j] = j. Now let's move on to the general case, that is, convert a non-empty word1[0..i - 1] to another non-empty word2[0..j - 1]. Well, let's try to break this problem down into smaller problems (sub-problems). Suppose we have already known how to convert word1[0..i - 2] to word2[0..j - 2], which is dp[i - 1][j - 1]. Now let's consider word[i - 1] and word2[j - 1]. If they are euqal, then no more operation is needed and dp[i][j] = dp[i - 1][j - 1]. Well, what if they are not equal? If they are not equal, we need to consider three cases: Replace word1[i - 1] by word2[j - 1] (dp[i][j] = dp[i - 1][j - 1] + 1 (for replacement)); Delete word1[i - 1] and word1[0..i - 2] = word2[0..j - 1] (dp[i][j] = dp[i - 1][j] + 1 (for deletion)); Insert word2[j - 1] to word1[0..i - 1] and word1[0..i - 1] + word2[j - 1] = word2[0..j - 1] (dp[i][j] = dp[i][j - 1] + 1 (for insertion)). Make sure you understand the subtle differences between the equations for deletion and insertion. For deletion, we are actually converting word1[0..i - 2] to word2[0..j - 1], which costs dp[i - 1][j], and then deleting the word1[i - 1], which costs 1. The case is similar for insertion. Putting these together, we now have: dp[i][0] = i; dp[0][j] = j; dp[i][j] = dp[i - 1][j - 1], if word1[i - 1] = word2[j - 1]; dp[i][j] = min(dp[i - 1][j - 1] + 1, dp[i - 1][j] + 1, dp[i][j - 1] + 1), otherwise. The above state equations can be turned into the following code directly. */
class Solution {
public:
int minDistance(string word1, string word2) {
int m = word1.length(), n = word2.length();
vector<vector<int> > dp(m + 1, vector<int> (n + 1, 0));
for (int i = 1; i <= m; i++)
dp[i][0] = i;
for (int j = 1; j <= n; j++)
dp[0][j] = j;
for (int i = 1; i <= m; i++) {
for (int j = 1; j <= n; j++) {
if (word1[i - 1] == word2[j - 1])
dp[i][j] = dp[i - 1][j - 1];
else dp[i][j] = min(dp[i - 1][j - 1] + 1, min(dp[i][j - 1] + 1, dp[i - 1][j] + 1));
}
}
return dp[m][n];
}
};
/* Well, you may have noticed that each time when we update dp[i][j], we only need dp[i - 1][j - 1], dp[i][j - 1], dp[i - 1][j]. In fact, we need not maintain the full m*n matrix. Instead, maintaing one column is enough. The code can be optimized to O(m) or O(n) space, depending on whether you maintain a row or a column of the original matrix. The optimized code is as follows. */
class Solution {
public:
int minDistance(string word1, string word2) {
int m = word1.length(), n = word2.length();
vector<int> cur(m + 1, 0);
for (int i = 1; i <= m; i++)
cur[i] = i;
for (int j = 1; j <= n; j++) {
int pre = cur[0];
cur[0] = j;
for (int i = 1; i <= m; i++) {
int temp = cur[i];
if (word1[i - 1] == word2[j - 1])
cur[i] = pre;
else cur[i] = min(pre + 1, min(cur[i] + 1, cur[i - 1] + 1));
pre = temp;
}
}
return cur[m];
}
};
/* Well, if you find the above code hard to understand, you may first try to write a two-column version that explicitly maintains two columns (the previous column and the current column) and then simplify the two-column version into the one-column version like the above code :-) */