* GreatSQL社区原创内容未经授权不得随意使用,转载请联系小编并注明来源。
分享一个在项目运维中遇到的一个主从复制限制的一个坑,项目的架构为主集群+灾备集群,每个集群为一主两从模式。主集群到灾备集群的同步为主从复制的方式,根据业务需求灾备集群需要忽略系统库跟某些配置表,所以才会触发此限制,而这个限制如果我们之前没有遇到过,那么排查起来也是相对不易的。
greatsql> show slave status\G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
Slave_IO_State: Waiting for master to send event
Master_Host: 192.168.xxx.xxx
Master_User: repl
Master_Port: 3306
Connect_Retry: 60
Master_Log_File: greatsql-bin.000990
Read_Master_Log_Pos: 92274290
Relay_Log_File: greatsql-relay.002963 -----
Relay_Log_Pos: 701548899
Relay_Master_Log_File: greatsql-bin.000988
Slave_IO_Running: Yes
Slave_SQL_Running: No
Replicate_Do_DB:
Replicate_Ignore_DB: mysql,dbscale,dbscale_tmp,information_schema,performance_schema,sys
Replicate_Do_Table:
Replicate_Ignore_Table:
Replicate_Wild_Do_Table:
Replicate_Wild_Ignore_Table: A.ab,B.bc
Last_Errno: 1146
Last_Error: Coordinator stopped because there were error(s) in the worker(s). The most recent failure being: Worker 1 failed executing transaction '9e668a93-2618-11ee-93ee-bc16954181bb:47508257' at master log greatdb-bin.000988, end_log_pos 701570116. See error log and/or performance_schema.replication_applier_status_by_worker table for more details about this failure or others, if any.
Skip_Counter: 0
Exec_Master_Log_Pos: 701548690
Relay_Log_Space: 2246320360
Until_Condition: None
Until_Log_File:
Until_Log_Pos: 0
Master_SSL_Allowed: No
Master_SSL_CA_File:
Master_SSL_CA_Path:
Master_SSL_Cert:
Master_SSL_Cipher:
Master_SSL_Key:
Seconds_Behind_Master: NULL
Master_SSL_Verify_Server_Cert: No
Last_IO_Errno: 0
Last_IO_Error:
Last_SQL_Errno: 1146
Last_SQL_Error: Coordinator stopped because there were error(s) in the worker(s). The most recent failure being: Worker 1 failed executing transaction '9e668a93-2618-11ee-93ee-bc16954181bb:47508257' at master log greatdb-bin.000988, end_log_pos 701570116. See error log and/or performance_schema.replication_applier_status_by_worker table for more details about this failure or others, if any.
Replicate_Ignore_Server_Ids:
Master_Server_Id: 1943306
Master_UUID: 9e668a93-2618-11ee-93ee-bc16954181bb
Master_Info_File: mysql.slave_master_info
SQL_Delay: 0
SQL_Remaining_Delay: NULL
Slave_SQL_Running_State:
Master_Retry_Count: 86400
Master_Bind:
Last_IO_Error_Timestamp:
Last_SQL_Error_Timestamp: 230822 14:14:18
Master_SSL_Crl:
Master_SSL_Crlpath:
Retrieved_Gtid_Set: 9e668a93-2618-11ee-93ee-bc16954181bb:2-47565802
Executed_Gtid_Set: 30873cfe-8750-11ed-b56f-744aa4073024:1-270,
9e668a93-2618-11ee-93ee-bc16954181bb:1-47508256
Auto_Position: 1
Replicate_Rewrite_DB:
Channel_Name:
Master_TLS_Version:
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
根据slave status状态信息可以看出
报错的GTID为:'9e668a93-2618-11ee-93ee-bc16954181bb:47508257'
应用的主集群的binlog为:greatsql-bin.000988
灾备集群的relay log为:greatsql-relay.002963
详细信息查看performance_schema.replication_applier_status_by_worker
表
greatsql> select * from performance_schema.replication_applier_status_by_worker\G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
CHANNEL_NAME:
WORKER_ID: 1
THREAD_ID: NULL
SERVICE_STATE: OFF
LAST_SEEN_TRANSACTION: 9e668a93-2618-11ee-93ee-bc16954181bb:47508257
LAST_ERROR_NUMBER: 1146
LAST_ERROR_MESSAGE: Worker 1 failed executing transaction
'9e668a93-2618-11ee-93ee-bc16954181bb:47508257' at master log greatdb-bin.000988,
end_log_pos 701570116; Error executing row event: 'Table 'abs_xxx.tmp_xxx_info' doesn't exist'
LAST_ERROR_TIMESTAMP: 2023-08-22 14:14:18
上述信息说明根据performance_schema.replication_applier_status_by_worker
表中的详细错误信息可以发现为灾备集群abs_xxx.tmp_xxx_info
表不存在,导致同步报错
3.1、确认灾备集群中目标表是否存在
greatsql> show create table abs_xxx.tmp_xxx_info;
ERROR 1146 (42S02): Table 'abs_xxx.tmp_xxx_info' doesn't exist
greatsql> desc abs_xxx.tmp_xxx_info;
ERROR 1146 (42S02): Table 'abs_xxx.tmp_xxx_info' doesn't exist
结论:灾备集群中目标表的确不存在
3.2、根据主从报错信息解析主集群binlog,报错的SQL
解析主集群binlog
SET @@SESSION.GTID_NEXT= '9e668a93-2618-11ee-93ee-bc16954181bb:47508257'/*!*/;
……
#230822 14:14:18 server id 1943306 end_log_pos 701570000 Table_map: `abs_xxx`.`tmp_xxx_info` mapped to number 1595
# at 701570000
#230822 14:14:18 server id 1943306 end_log_pos 701570116 Write_rows: table id 1595 flags: STMT_END_F
### INSERT INTO `abs_xxx`.`tmp_xxx_info`
### SET
### @1=2
### @2='自动化'
### @3='2300121212120000'
### @4='90000000'
### @5='1'
### @6='202001290231001'
### @7='2021-01-31 00:00:00'
# at 701570116
#230822 14:14:18 server id 1943306 end_log_pos 701570143 Xid = 800998400
COMMIT/*!*/;
# at 701570143
#230822 14:14:18 server id 1943306 end_log_pos 701570204 GTID last_committed=26491 sequence_number=26521 rbr_only=yes
/*!50718 SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ COMMITTED*//*!*/;
结论:根据复制的报错信息得知具体的GTID号以及主集群的binlog文件,解析binlog得知此事务为一条INSERT语句,语句中的目标表与performance_schema.replication_applier_status_by_worker
表中信息一致
3.3、寻找主集群目标表binlog中是否有建表语句
在同一binlog日志中寻找建表语句
SET TIMESTAMP=1692684495/*!*/;
CREATE DATABASE IF NOT EXISTS `abs_xxx` /*!40100 DEFAULT CHARACTER SET utf8 COLLATE utf8_bin */
/*!*/;
……
use `information_schema`/*!*/;
SET TIMESTAMP=1692684495/*!*/;
CREATE TABLE `abs_xxx`.`tmp_xxx_info` (
`ID` int(64) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`CUSTOMER_NAME` varchar(256) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
`CUSTOMER_NUM` varchar(256) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
`PRODIST_SKU_NUM` varchar(64) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
`STATUS` varchar(64) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
`AGREEMENT_NUM` varchar(256) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
`END_DATE` datetime DEFAULT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`ID`),
KEY `PK_PRODIST_SKU_NUM_AGREEMENT` (`PRODIST_SKU_NUM`) USING BTREE,
KEY `IDX_AGREEMENT_NUM` (`AGREEMENT_NUM`) USING BTREE
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=2 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4 COLLATE=utf8mb4_bin ROW_FORMAT=DYNAMIC
/*!*/;
# at 475864451
结论:在主集群的binlog日志中找到了目标表的建表语句,说明主集群执行DDL时并没有关闭binlog日志,那么继续查看在灾备集群的中继日志中是否存在DDL语句
3.4、解析灾备集群的中继日志,确认是否拉取到灾备集群
#230822 14:08:15 server id 1943306 end_log_pos 475863662 GTID last_committed=16341 sequence_number=16342 rbr_only=no
SET @@SESSION.GTID_NEXT= '9e668a93-2618-11ee-93ee-bc16954181bb:47498079'/*!*/;
……
use `information_schema`/*!*/;
SET TIMESTAMP=1692684495/*!*/;
CREATE TABLE `abs_xxx`.`tmp_xxx_info` (
`ID` int(64) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`CUSTOMER_NAME` varchar(256) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
`CUSTOMER_NUM` varchar(256) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
`PRODIST_SKU_NUM` varchar(64) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
`STATUS` varchar(64) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
`AGREEMENT_NUM` varchar(256) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
`END_DATE` datetime DEFAULT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`ID`),
KEY `PK_PRODIST_SKU_NUM_AGREEMENT` (`PRODIST_SKU_NUM`) USING BTREE,
KEY `IDX_AGREEMENT_NUM` (`AGREEMENT_NUM`) USING BTREE
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=2 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4 COLLATE=utf8mb4_bin ROW_FORMAT=DYNAMIC
/*!*/;
# at 475864660
#230822 14:08:15 server id 1943306 end_log_pos 475864512 GTID last_committed=16342 sequence_number=16343 rbr_only=yes
/*!50718 SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ COMMITTED*//*!*/;
结论:灾备集群的中继日志中存在DDL建表语句,说明并不是IO线程出了问题
3.5、排查复制配置的忽略库表
Replicate_Ignore_DB: mysql,dbscale,dbscale_tmp,information_schema,performance_schema,sys
Replicate_Wild_Ignore_Table: A.ab,B.bc
结论:忽略库表中并不包含目标表,但是根据以上解析日志发现,在主集群binlog日志中建表语句之前有个use information_schema/!/;
的语句,此库为同步忽略的系统库,因此触发了GreatSQL的规范限制,在忽略库下对未忽略进行操作Statement模式下记录语句默认不起作用 (详情:https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.7/en/replication-options-replica.html#option_mysqld_replicate-do-db)
在灾备集群创建目标表
greatsql> CREATE TABLE `abs_xxx`.`tmp_xxx_info` (
`ID` int(64) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`CUSTOMER_NAME` varchar(256) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
`CUSTOMER_NUM` varchar(256) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
`PRODIST_SKU_NUM` varchar(64) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
`STATUS` varchar(64) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
`AGREEMENT_NUM` varchar(256) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
`END_DATE` datetime DEFAULT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`ID`),
KEY `PK_PRODIST_SKU_NUM_AGREEMENT` (`PRODIST_SKU_NUM`) USING BTREE,
KEY `IDX_AGREEMENT_NUM` (`AGREEMENT_NUM`) USING BTREE
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=2 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4 COLLATE=utf8mb4_bin ROW_FORMAT=DYNAMIC;
greatsql> stop slave;
greatsql> start slave;
结论:在灾备集群创建目标表后重启复制恢复成功
执行DDL时进入目标库
greatsql> use abs_cust
greatsql> DDL 语句(CREATE\DROP\ALTER)
说明:在应用连接数据库时有可能默认就是information_schema
库,而此环境将系统库全部忽略,所以为了规避类似的问题,请在执行SQL语句时请先use到目标表的目标库。
修改主从复制配置,以下步骤为测试环境
关闭灾备集群在复制同步
greatsql> stop slave;
Query OK, 0 rows affected, 1 warning (0.03 sec)
修改忽略库
greatsql> change replication filter Replicate_Ignore_DB=();
修改忽略表
greatsql> change replication filter replicate_wild_ignore_table =('mysql.%','information_schema.%','sys.%','performance_schema.%');
启动同步
greatsql> start slave;
Query OK, 0 rows affected, 1 warning (0.37 sec)
测试验证
主集群:
greatsql> use mysql
Reading table information for completion of table and column names
You can turn off this feature to get a quicker startup with -A
Database changed
greatsql> create table test111.test111(id int primary key);
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.06 sec)
greatsql> show tables;
+-------------------+
| Tables_in_test111 |
+-------------------+
| test111 |
+-------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
灾备集群:
greatsql> use test111
Reading table information for completion of table and column names
You can turn off this feature to get a quicker startup with -A
Database changed
greatsql> show tables;
+-------------------+
| Tables_in_test111 |
+-------------------+
| test111 |
+-------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
说明:复制配置中参数Replicate_Ignore_DB
设置为空,将replicate_wild_ignore_table
参数设置为shema_name.%
的方式也可以规避类似的问题
在MySQL 5.7跟8.0版本也存在此限制
Enjoy GreatSQL :)
《深入浅出MGR》视频课程
戳此小程序即可直达B站
https://www.bilibili.com/medialist/play/1363850082?business=space_collection&business_id=343928&desc=0
文章推荐:
GreatSQL MGR + ProxySQL集群搭建方案
MGR新节点RECOVERING状态的分析与解决:caching_sha2_password验证插件的影响
图文结合丨玩转MySQL Shell for GreatSQL
野路子mysqld_safe玩法搞死mysqld进程
MTS性能监控你知道多少
MySQL 8.0.29 instant DDL 数据腐化问题分析
GreatSQL删除表分区特别慢的原因分析
MySQL对derived table的优化处理与使用限制
MySQL一次大量内存消耗的跟踪
MySQL运行时的可观测性
Myloader导入更快吗?并没有。。。
自打有了GIPKs,DBA和开发再也不用battle了
重现一条简单SQL的优化过程
想看更多技术好文,点个“在看”吧!